When
it comes to writing, I don’t put much store in "natural talent," or
that "some people have it, and some don't". I think "talent"
is a combination of passion, persistence, hard work, and openness to feedback -
through which a writer continues to improve his/her craft.
But where
to go for feedback, and what to do with it? Ideally, you go to other
writers whose opinions you trust and respect. Friends and lay people who
don't meet this criteria will tend to be vague, too easy or too harsh, and not
particularly helpful, because they don't really grasp what you're trying to accomplish
and/or how to help you.
If
you don't know any professional writers, book editors, literary professionals, you
can hire a professional to evaluate your work. If you can’t afford a pro, then
find peers—fellow writers or people aspiring to be one—who are at your level
and willing to trade serious feedback on your work for the same in return.
(Please realize how huge an imposition it can be to ask someone to read your
material and give a detailed and honest reaction to it - it takes valuable time,
may not be enjoyable to them, and they risk alienating you with what they say
about it, or visa versa.)
Writers—especially
new writers—need encouragement and people who read their work and offer constructive
feedback. Getting demoralized about your work is not helpful, but we do need
a reality check and perspective from others—all writers do—and that can be
painful. But that's how a writer grows. I recommend encouraging
your readers to hold nothing back - and not get defensive or try to convince
them they are wrong, which just shuts them down and makes them not want to give
more. You should get as much out of them as you can, collect the
information, and then determine what to use and what to ignore.
You
don’t have to agree with everything they say, or follow their specific
guidance. I like to have multiple readers, and I look for what there's a
consensus about. On the other hand, being defensive and stubborn may
stifle you as a writer, and alienate those giving you feedback. The key is to uncover
the real problems and not get distracted by minor/personal whims. For that, you
may need back and forth dialog with your beta reader where you ask probing
questions to dig down to the heart of the issues.
And
then, YOU decide how to fix whatever they have uncovered, through the filter of
your sensibility. You want others to help you find the problems, period.
Only use their suggested fixes if you really believe in them. If not,
find your own. They may be trying to help with suggestions, but it's not
their project, it's yours.
Your
work has to please you first, but ultimately you want it to please others too.
Getting quality feedback is essential to achieving this.
1 comment:
Great post. I participate in a critique group that I really couldn't live without. Another benefit of being in a group is learning how to take criticism. The hard part is figuring out what to do when the group splits 50/50 on something. Lay readers are full of praise which is nice, but not what I need when I'm writing. Thanks Alan!
Post a Comment