Shortly after a twenty-one-year-old killed nine people in a
South Carolina church this week, President Obama stated that the USA is the
only advanced nation that has this problem, this social disease of gun
violence. As you would expect, he received a ton of pushback from the NRA
(whose solution is to arm everyone) and the GOP (whose solution is to ignore
the problem), but Obama is correct. America has the loosest gun control laws in
the developed world, and—no surprise—has the highest gun-related homicides. Of
the world’s 23 most developed countries, the U.S. gun-related murder rate is 20
times that of the other 22 countries combined.
Japan has virtually eliminated shooting deaths. How you ask?
Simple, by forbidding almost all forms of firearm ownership, and the results
are impressive, as few as two gun-related homicides a year. That compares to
over 30,000 deaths a year in the USA.
Seriously, 2 vs. 30,000 deaths.
Admittedly, Japan has a smaller population, and because Japan
doesn’t have a wide mix of different races, they have few, if any, race related
shootings. But the percentage of wing-nuts in Japan is not lower that the USA. So
with their fair share of crazies, why only two gun-related deaths per year?
Because no private citizen in Japan owns guns.
If you fire off a round from a handgun in Japan you break three
different laws—one for holding a handgun, one for possessing unlicensed
bullets, and one for firing the bullets. Just holding a handgun is punishable
by one to ten years in prison. Handguns and small-caliber rifles have been
illegal to buy or sell in Japan since 1971.
Japan and the U.S. have radically opposed views about crime,
privacy, and police powers. The U.S. constitution’s second amendment is
intended in part to maintain “the security of a free State” by ensuring that
the government doesn’t have a monopoly on force, where as many people see
Japan’s laws on gun control, search, and seizure to be more of a police state.
But in the end, are thirty thousands lives lost every year worth
having the ability to take arms against our government? Only last night a gun
fired in the street in front of my mother’s house shot a bullet through her
kitchen wall and shattered the sliding glass door on the opposite side of the
room. My mother lived in fear every time she left her house, now she lives in
fear even when she is in the house. Is every American living in fear,
twenty-four-seven, worth having the means of fighting our own government? Our
government is not the enemy, killers with guns are.
Seriously, my friends and colleagues, it’s time to enact serious
gun restrictions in this country, because that next bullet might have your name
on it, or the name of a loved one. Let’s not live in constant fear. Let’s
disarm the people who don’t need guns, which in my view is everyone excluding
the police and military.
No comments:
Post a Comment