I was reading Cat On A Hot Tin Roof last night, and
toward the end of act II, when Brick and Big Daddy are discussing why Brick is
an alcoholic and the possibility of his being gay, the author put in some
personal notes as guidance for the actors. I found it memorable:
The thing they’re discussing, timidly and
painfully on the side of Big Daddy, fiercely, violently on Brick’s side, is the
inadmissible thing that Skipper died to disavow between them. The fact that if
it existed it had to be disavowed to “keep face” in the world they lived in may
be at the heart of the “mendacity” that Brick drinks to kill his disgust with.
It may be the root of his collapse. Or maybe it is only a single manifestation
of it, not even the most important.
The bird that I hope to catch in the net of
this play is not the solution of one man’s psychological problem. I’m trying to
catch the true quality of experience in a group of people, that cloudy,
flickering evanescent—fiercely charged!—interplay of live human beings in the
thundercloud of a common crisis.
Some mystery should be left in the revelation
of character in a play, just as a great deal of mystery is always left in the
revelation of character in life, even in one’s own character to himself. This
does not absolve the playwright of his duty to observe and probe as clearly and
deeply as he legitimately can; but it should steer him away from pat
conclusions, facile definitions which make a play just a play, not a snare for
the truth of human experience.
The following scene should be played with
great concentration, with most of the power leashed but palpable in what is
left unspoken.
To me this is powerful
advice to any writer.
No comments:
Post a Comment