I just finished a novel by a new author. I enjoyed the first
thirty or forty pages, but then I noticed a pattern developing. All female
characters were shown as strong, intelligent, and resourceful. However, all
(and I do mean ALL) the men were either lying cheating bastards, spineless
buffoons, or drug addicts who couldn’t tie their shoelaces without some woman
there to show them how.
It became clear to me, that this woman writer had huge
emotional issues with men—the kind of woman typically called a “man-hater”.
I found her treatment of women vs. men characters sexist and
offensive. It colored the rest of the story, making it impossible for me to
enjoy the book, or to take her seriously as a writer. I did finish the story,
but only because I had agreed to review it, and I can state I will never bother
with another of her books.
I have no issue with someone writing a story geared for
women. Neither do I take issue with flawed characters, male or female. In fact,
flawed characters tend to be the most interesting. But I do resent authors who
blatantly attack a group of people by portraying them all as flawed, with
little or no redeeming qualities.
After my first novel, Island Song, was published, I read
through the story and realized I had presented a Christian preacher as totally
flawed, a very unsavory character. I was more than a little mortified to
realize I had let my resentment of the Church so blatantly color my story. In my second novel, which also had a
clergyman, I went out of my way to make that person a sympathetic character.
The writers I’m most impressed with try to show a fine
balance of empathetic qualities and flawed qualities in each and every
character, for their heroes and villains alike.
I think it’s one of the key traits of good storytelling.
No comments:
Post a Comment