I
saw the movie when it first hit the theaters and love this slow-burn love
story. I loved it so much I bought the book and plowed through it. This is one
of the few times when I thought the movie was much better than the book.
The
protagonist, Elio, a precocious seventeen year-old becomes infatuated with
Oliver, a twenty-four year-old staying at their house as a summer intern for
Elio’s father. Elio and Oliver, through several intellectual and esoteric
conversations, become attracted to each other, and eventually fall in love. It
is a simple love story. During this time, Elio constantly analyzes and
second-guesses every innuendo-laden exchange with Oliver. This scrutiny was subtly done in
the movie, but in the book it is relentless to the point of becoming annoying,
and making Elio appear to be a self-absorbed, distressingly obsessed twit.
Yes,
I get that a teenager can be self-absorbed and obsessed over love. I’m not so
old I can’t remember what that was like. But that doesn’t mean I want to read
page after page of it throughout an entire book. It gets overly tedious after
the first fifty pages.
The
prose is very well written and most often a joy to read. There were moments
between the lovers that were poignant and relatable, sweeping me up into their relationship,
but those moments were often swamped by page after page of Elio’s internal
dialogue, worrying his feelings like a dog worries a bone. It is a beautiful
story, yet it never reached the height or splendor of the movie.
Had
I not loved the movie so much, I’m not sure I would have finished the book.
1 comment:
its weird because a straight dude wrote the book. i wonder if it wasn't a boy-girl originally and he flipped it to stand out and sell. i thought the movie was too slow and didn't showcase the subtlety enough. except for the dad, who could be read throughout the movie. Plus nothing happened in the movie!!!!! but until out gay actors actually get to play gay characters we'll have to suffer thru this rubbish
Post a Comment